Žižek, Slavoj. “Love Thy Neighbor? No , Thanks!” in Psychoanalysis and Racism. ed. Anthony Lane, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. 154-175.) a slighty different version of this essay appears in The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997.
According to Lacan, Hegel, in his dialectics of Lord and Bondsman, misses the key point: Jouissance is on the side not of the Master but rather of his servant — that is, what keeps the servant enslaved is precisely the little piece of jouissance thrown to him by his Master. Lacan’s reproach to the standard version of the Cunning of Reason (the Slave who works and thus renounces jouissance, this way laying foundation for his future freedom, in contrast to the Master who is idioticized by his jouissance) is that it is, on the contrary, the Slave who has access to jouissance from his ambiguous relation to the Other’s supposed jouissance (to Master qua “subject supposed to enjoy”). See Lacan, “Subversion.” (page 174, Note 2)