{"id":1495,"date":"2009-01-15T13:19:37","date_gmt":"2009-01-15T18:19:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?page_id=1495"},"modified":"2014-03-22T14:24:53","modified_gmt":"2014-03-22T18:24:53","slug":"butler-quote","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/butler-quote\/","title":{"rendered":"Judith Butler"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/judith-butler.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-7915\" title=\"judith-butler\" src=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/judith-butler.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"183\" height=\"225\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Taking for granted one\u2019s own linguistic horizon as the ultimate linguistic horizon leads to an enormous parochialism and keeps us from being open to radical difference and from undergoing the discomfort and the anxiety of realizing that the scheme of intelligibility on which we rely fundamentally is not adequate, is not common, and closes us off from the possibility of understanding others and ourselves in a more fundamentally capacious way.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Changing the Subject<\/em> 2000<\/p>\n<p>Significantly, when he later claims that I am &#8216;caught in the game of power that [I] oppose&#8217; (SZ 220), he does not consider that such complicity is, for me, the condition of agency rather than its destruction<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Contingency, Hegemony, Universality<\/em> 2000<\/p>\n<p>The critic thus has a double task, to show how knowledge and power work to constitute a more or less systematic way of ordering the world with its own \u201cconditions of acceptability of a system,\u201d but also \u201cto follow the breaking points which indicate its emergence.\u201d So not only is it necessary to isolate and identify the peculiar nexus of power and knowledge that gives rise to the field of intelligible things, but also to track the way in which that field meets its breaking point, the moments of its discontinuities, the sites where it fails to constitute the intelligibility for which it stands. What this means is that one looks both for the conditions by which the object field is constituted, but also for the limits of those conditions, the moments where they point up their contingency and their transformability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em> What is Critique<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">words, acts, gestures, and desire produce the effect of an internal core or substance, but produce this <em>on <\/em>the surface of the body, through the play of signifying absences that suggest, but never reveal, the organizing principle of idenity as a cause.\u00a0 Such acts, gestures, enactments, generally construed, are <em>performative<\/em> in the sense that the essence or identity that they otherwise purport to express are <em>fabrications<\/em> manufactured and sustained through corporeal signs and other discursive means.\u00a0 That the gendered body is performative suggests that it has no ontological status apart from the various acts which constitute its reality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><em>Gender Trouble<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Taking for granted one\u2019s own linguistic horizon as the ultimate linguistic horizon leads to an enormous parochialism and keeps us from being open to radical difference and from undergoing the discomfort and the anxiety of realizing that the scheme of intelligibility on which we rely fundamentally is not adequate, is not common, and closes us &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/butler-quote\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Judith Butler&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1495","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1495","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1495"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1495\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12603,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1495\/revisions\/12603"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1495"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}