{"id":10447,"date":"2013-02-19T00:26:10","date_gmt":"2013-02-19T05:26:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=10447"},"modified":"2013-02-19T00:47:35","modified_gmt":"2013-02-19T05:47:35","slug":"10447","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/02\/19\/10447\/","title":{"rendered":"animal to subject"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek &#8220;Notes on a Debate &#8221; <em>Criticism.<\/em> 46:4 (2004) 661-666.<\/p>\n<p>On Badiou and Deleuze:<\/p>\n<p>However, what unites them above this difference is that both perform the same paradoxical philosophical gesture of defending,<em><strong> as materialists<\/strong><\/em>, the autonomy of the &#8220;immaterial&#8221; order of\u00a0the\u00a0Event.\u00a0 As a materialist, and in order to be thoroughly materialist, Badiou focuses on the <em><strong>idealist<\/strong><\/em> topos par excellence: How can a human animal forsake its animality and put its life in the service of a transcendent Truth? How can the &#8220;transubstantiation&#8221; from the pleasure-oriented life of an <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 11pt;\">individual<\/span> to the life of a <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 11pt;\">subject<\/span> dedicated to a Cause occur?<\/p>\n<p>In other words, <strong>how is a free act possible? How can one break (out of) the network of the causal connections of positive reality and conceive of an act that begins by and in itself?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In short, Badiou repeats within the materialist frame the elementary gesture of idealist anti-reductionism: human Reason cannot be reduced to the result of evolutionary adaptation; art is not just a heightened procedure of providing sensual pleasures, but a medium of Truth; and so on. Additionally, against the false appearance that this gesture is also aimed at psychoanalysis (is not the point of the notion of &#8220;sublimation&#8221; that the allegedly &#8220;higher&#8221; human activities are just a roundabout &#8220;sublimated&#8221; way to realize a &#8220;lower&#8221; goal?), <span style=\"color: red; font-weight: bold;\">therein resides already the significant achievement of psychoanalysis: its claim is that sexuality itself, sexual drives pertaining to the human animal, cannot be accounted for in evolutionary terms<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>This makes clear the true stakes of Badiou&#8217;s gesture: in order for materialism to truly win over idealism, it is not enough to succeed in the &#8220;reductionist&#8221; approach and demonstrate how mind, consciousness, and so forth can nonetheless somehow be accounted for within the evolutionary-positivist frame of materialism. On the contrary, the materialist claim should be much stronger: it is <em><strong>only<\/strong><\/em> materialism that can accurately explain the very phenomena of mind, consciousness, and so forth; and, conversely, it is idealism that is &#8220;vulgar,&#8221; that always already &#8220;reifies&#8221; these phenomena. 665<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek &#8220;Notes on a Debate &#8221; Criticism. 46:4 (2004) 661-666. On Badiou and Deleuze: However, what unites them above this difference is that both perform the same paradoxical philosophical gesture of defending, as materialists, the autonomy of the &#8220;immaterial&#8221; order of\u00a0the\u00a0Event.\u00a0 As a materialist, and in order to be thoroughly materialist, Badiou focuses on the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/02\/19\/10447\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;animal to subject&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,6,106,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-badiou","category-event","category-the-act","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10447"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10450,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10447\/revisions\/10450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}