{"id":11856,"date":"2013-09-03T11:41:11","date_gmt":"2013-09-03T16:41:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=11856"},"modified":"2013-09-03T12:56:20","modified_gmt":"2013-09-03T17:56:20","slug":"11856","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/09\/03\/11856\/","title":{"rendered":"mcgowan enjoyment envy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>According to Freud, all group members install the leader in the position of an ego ideal, and this ego ideal held in common furthers the bond among members of society. But the identification with the leader has two sides to it: on the one hand subjects identify with the leader\u2019s symbolic position as a <strong>noncastrated ideal<\/strong> existing beyond the world of lack; but on the other hand, subjects identify with the leader\u2019s weaknesses, which exist in spite of the powerful image.<\/p>\n<p>Both modes of identification work together in order to give subjects a sense of being a member of society, but they work in radically different ways. The identification with the leader\u2019s power provides the subject with a sense of symbolic identity and recognition, <strong>whereas the identification with the leader\u2019s weaknesses allows the subject to enjoy being a part of the community<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The identification with the leader\u2019s strength provides pleasure that obscures the enjoyment deriving from the identification with the leader\u2019s weaknesses. <strong>The weaknesses indicate that the leader is a subject of loss<\/strong>, <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">that she\/he enjoys rather than being entirely devoted to ruling as a neutral embodiment of the people<\/span>. <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">The weaknesses are evidence of the leader\u2019s enjoyment, points at which a private enjoyment stains the public image.<\/span> <strong>By identifying with these points, subjects in a community affirm the association of enjoyment with loss rather than with presence.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The [leader\u2019s] strength allows subject who identify with the leader in her\/his weakness to disavow this would-be traumatic identification and to associate themselves consciously with strength rather than weakness. 162<\/p>\n<p>The fundamental barrier to the establishment of an authentic social bond is the resistance to avowing the traumatic nature of that bond. 163<\/p>\n<p>The structure of society (which is the result of the structure of signification) is such that it blinds the subject to the possibility of shared sacrifice and the social bond that results from it. N<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">o matter how often children hear the ideology of sharing or how many times we repeat to them the gospel of fairness, they will inevitably believe that their sacrifice has enabled others to enjoy more than their proper share or unfairly<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>As Slavoj \u017di\u017eek points out in <em> Tarrying with the Negative<\/em>, \u201cWe always impute to the \u2018other\u2019 an excessive enjoyment: he wants to steal our enjoyment (by ruining our way of life) and\/or he has access to some secret, perverse enjoyment. In short, <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">what really bothers us about the \u2018other\u2019 is the peculiar way he organizes his enjoyment,<\/span> precisely the surplus, the \u2018excess\u2019 that pertains to this way: the smell of \u2018their\u2019 food, \u2018their\u2019 noisy songs and dances, \u2018their\u2019 strange manners, \u2018their\u2019 attitude toward work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">This belief \u2013 the paranoia about the other\u2019s secret enjoyment \u2013 derives from the signifier\u2019s inability to manifest its transparency.<\/span><\/strong> 163-164<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;] <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">paranoia is written into the structure of the signifier itself<\/span> &#8230; The belief that the other holds a secret enjoyment that the subject has sacrificed renders the smooth functioning of collective life impossible. The force that allows human beings to come together to form a society in common \u2014 language \u2014 is at once the force that prevents any society from working out. The structure of the signifier militates against utopia. It produces societies replete with subjects paranoid about, and full of envy for, the enjoying other. 164 &#8211; 165<\/p>\n<p>Though one might imagine a society in which subjects enjoyed without bothering themselves about the other&#8217;s enjoyment, such a vision fails to comprehend the nature of our enjoyment.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>We find our enjoyment through that of the other rather than intrinsically within ourselves.<\/strong><\/span> <strong>Our envy of the other&#8217;s enjoyment persists because this is the mode through which we ourselves enjoy.<\/strong> It is thus far easier to give up the idea of one&#8217;s own private enjoyment for the sake of the social order than it is to give up the idea of the enjoying other. 165<\/p>\n<p>The other is perhaps enjoying, but this is not an enjoyment that occurs in spite of loss. <span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Like the subject\u2019s own, the other\u2019s enjoyment is the enjoyment of loss because there is no other kind.<\/strong><\/span> <strong>Recognizing the link between enjoyment and loss \u2013 that is, accepting the logic of female sexuation \u2013 allows subjects to emphasize enjoyment at the expense of pleasure.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Those who achieve this experience the impossibility of having the object, recognizing that <strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">one can never have the object because it is nothing,<\/span><\/strong> <strong>existing only insofar as it is lost<\/strong>, and it is only in this form that it provides enjoyment for the subject. 165<\/p>\n<p><strong>As subjects of loss,<\/strong> there is no barrier to the establishment of an authentic social bond, one where envy does not play a key role. The antagonism between the society and the individual develops out of the envy that subjects experience when they believe other members of the society have greater access to the privileged object than they do.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"> For the subject who grasps that this object only exists \u2013 and can only be enjoyed \u2013 through its loss, envy is no longer inevitable.<\/span> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The composition of nothing is such that no one can have more of it than anyone else;<strong> there can be no hierarchy of loss, because everyone alike loses nothing.<\/strong> The authentic society of <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">subjects connected through the embrace of trauma<\/span> would be a society that could recognize that nothing is something after all. 165-166<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>According to Freud, all group members install the leader in the position of an ego ideal, and this ego ideal held in common furthers the bond among members of society. But the identification with the leader has two sides to it: on the one hand subjects identify with the leader\u2019s symbolic position as a noncastrated &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/09\/03\/11856\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;mcgowan enjoyment envy&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125,21,40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11856","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drive","category-jouissance","category-lack"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11856","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11856"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11856\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11865,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11856\/revisions\/11865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}