{"id":12177,"date":"2013-10-16T20:20:06","date_gmt":"2013-10-17T01:20:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=12177"},"modified":"2013-10-16T20:20:06","modified_gmt":"2013-10-17T01:20:06","slug":"zizek-brockport-2012","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/10\/16\/zizek-brockport-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"\u017di\u017eek brockport 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/youtu.be\/Snn3ymxbUqA?t=1h31m\" target=\"_blank\">On Badiou<\/a><br \/>\nBadiou duality: aniimal life, humans, event happens we are interpellated into subjects.\u00a0 Badiou&#8217;s ontological edifice there is no place for psychoanalysis, what psychoanalysis calls the Death Drive<br \/>\nSubjectivity linked to this is not human animal, but not yet the Badiouian EVENT.\u00a0 Badiou almost becomes a dualist: His mistake is animal life, there is NO SUCH thing as animal life, humans funcitoning in pleasure principle.\u00a0 NO DEATH DRIVE MEANS WE ARE constantly sabotaging ourselves.\u00a0 Animal life and the truth event doesn&#8217;t cover the whole field.\u00a0 Look at how Badiou talks about death drive, death drive for him is morbid etc.\u00a0 THere has to be a 3rd dimension, he tries to read death drive as the shadow of the Event. You have to have anxiety at evental site, but for him in Theory of Subject his best book, he is well aware of necessity of anxiety but it is just a retroactive shadow of the event, but I have my doubts I am more Lacanian here.<br \/>\nas<br \/>\ndf<br \/>\nasdf<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Badiou Badiou duality: aniimal life, humans, event happens we are interpellated into subjects.\u00a0 Badiou&#8217;s ontological edifice there is no place for psychoanalysis, what psychoanalysis calls the Death Drive Subjectivity linked to this is not human animal, but not yet the Badiouian EVENT.\u00a0 Badiou almost becomes a dualist: His mistake is animal life, there is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2013\/10\/16\/zizek-brockport-2012\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;\u017di\u017eek brockport 2012&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12177"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12178,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12177\/revisions\/12178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}