{"id":1420,"date":"2009-01-10T13:42:02","date_gmt":"2009-01-10T18:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=1420"},"modified":"2010-04-12T17:51:09","modified_gmt":"2010-04-12T21:51:09","slug":"1420","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/01\/10\/1420\/","title":{"rendered":"power agency"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Butler, Judith. The <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Psychic Life of Power<\/span>. Standford UP. 1997. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The power that initiates the subject fails to remain continuous with the power thatis teh subject`s agency. &#8230; How is it that the power upon which the subject depends for existence and which the subject is compelled to reiterate turns against itself in the course of that reiteration? How might we think resistance within the terms of reiteration. 12<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According to the formulation of subjection as both the subordination and becoming of the subject, power is, as subordination, a set of conditions that precedes the subject, effecting and subordinating the subject from the outside.\u00a0 This formulation falters, however, when we consider that there is no subject prior to this effect. Power not only <em>acts on<\/em> a subject but, in a transitive sense, <em>enacts<\/em> the subject into being.\u00a0 13<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">&#8230; the subject is itself a site of this ambivalence in which the subject emerges both as the <em>effect<\/em> of a prior power and as the <em>condition of possibility<\/em> for a radically conditioned form of agency.  A theory of the subject should take into account the full ambivalence of the conditions of its operation (15).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Agency<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Agency exceeds the power by which it is enabled. One might say that the purposes of power are not always the purposes of agency. To the extent that the latter diverge from the former, agency is the assumption of a purpose <em>unintended<\/em> by power, one that could not have been derived logically or historically, that operates in a relation of contingency and reversal to the power that makes it possible, to which it nevertheless belongs. This is, as it were, the ambivalent scene of agency, constrained by no teleological necessity (15).<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Power is never merely a condition external or prior to the subject, nor can it be exclusively identified with the subject. If conditions of power are to persist, they must be reiterated;  <strong>the subject is precisely the site of such reiteration, a repetition that is never merely mechanical <\/strong>(16)<\/span>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That agency is implicated in subordination is not the sign of a fatal self-contradiction at the core of the subject and, hence, further proof of its pernicious or obsolete character.\u00a0 But neither does it restore a pristine notion of the subject, derived from some classical liberal-humanist formulation, whose agency is always and only opposed to power.\u00a0 The first view characterizes politically sanctimonious forms of fatalism; the second, naive forms of political optimism. I hope to steer clear of both these alternatives. 17<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"background-color: yellow;\">The subject might yet be thought as deriving its agency from precisely the power it opposes, as awkward and embarrassing as such a formulation might be<\/span>, especially for those who believe that complicity and ambivalence could be rooted out once and for all. If the subject is <em>neither<\/em> fully determined by power <em>nor<\/em> fully determining of power (but significantly and partially both), the subject exceeds the logic of noncontradiction, is an excrescence of logic, as it were.  To claim that the subject exceeds either\/or is not to claim that it lives in some free zone of its own making.  Exceeding is not escaping, and the subject exceeds precisely that to which it is bound.  In this sense, the subject cannot quell the ambivalence by which it is constituted (17-18).<\/p>\n<div><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Vicki Kirby writes (2006: 111):<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In order to reconfigure the scene of political contestation and individual agency in more robust and effective ways, Butler will open the division between the psyche and the political to the same strategic revisions she brought to the nature\/culture, material\/representation distinction.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power. Standford UP. 1997. The power that initiates the subject fails to remain continuous with the power thatis teh subject`s agency. &#8230; How is it that the power upon which the subject depends for existence and which the subject is compelled to reiterate turns against itself in the course &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/01\/10\/1420\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;power agency&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,78,80,93,102,90,15],"tags":[134,109],"class_list":["post-1420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agency","category-butler","category-citationality","category-conscience","category-iterability","category-resistance","category-subjectivity","tag-psychiclife","tag-whoa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1420"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1420\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1424,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1420\/revisions\/1424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}