{"id":274,"date":"2008-09-03T13:55:35","date_gmt":"2008-09-03T17:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=274"},"modified":"2008-11-10T19:57:01","modified_gmt":"2008-11-10T23:57:01","slug":"bhaskar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2008\/09\/03\/bhaskar\/","title":{"rendered":"bhaskar&#8217;s ontology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For GH, Bhaskar&#8217;s ontology focuses on the stuff, the furniture of the world&#8217; in a manner of speaking, which doesn&#8217;t adequately investigate the &#8216;being of beings&#8217;, or how this stuff emerges within a relational, contingent historical context.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We follow Heidegger here by focusing on the historicity and contingency of beings &#8212; and not just on the contingent interaction of fully constituted causal mechanisms &#8230; against Bhaskar we &#8230; cannot sever beings from the relational contexts in which they appear (160).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">(I)n Bhaskar&#8217;s account there is a short-circuiting of the necessary and complex relationship between the ontical and ontological levels of analysis.\u00a0 Social structures (or &#8216;society&#8217;) &#8230; are ultimately privileged &#8230; what Bhaskar calls &#8216;intransitive objects&#8217;: &#8220;things [that] exist independently of our descriptions&#8217;.\u00a0 In his account of structure and agency, he thus privileges the role of structures &#8230; what this does not fully take on board, as Laclau has pointed out, is the transitive nature of the transitive-intransitive distinction (161).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For GH, Bhaskar&#8217;s ontology focuses on the stuff, the furniture of the world&#8217; in a manner of speaking, which doesn&#8217;t adequately investigate the &#8216;being of beings&#8217;, or how this stuff emerges within a relational, contingent historical context. We follow Heidegger here by focusing on the historicity and contingency of beings &#8212; and not just on &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2008\/09\/03\/bhaskar\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;bhaskar&#8217;s ontology&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-event","category-retroduction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1192,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions\/1192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}