{"id":3075,"date":"2009-04-29T13:08:01","date_gmt":"2009-04-29T18:08:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/04\/29\/3075\/"},"modified":"2009-04-30T11:39:50","modified_gmt":"2009-04-30T16:39:50","slug":"3075","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/04\/29\/3075\/","title":{"rendered":"sexuation female existential"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Female Existential:<br \/>\n&#8216;there is no entity x that says &#8220;no&#8221; to the phallic function&#8217;.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-3074\" href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/04\/29\/3075\/notxphallic\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3074 aligncenter\" title=\"notxphallic\" src=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/notxphallic.jpg\" alt=\"notxphallic\" width=\"142\" height=\"38\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>There <strong>is<\/strong> not any that is not phallic jouissance, the emphasis going on the first &#8220;is.&#8221; All the jouissances that do <strong>exist<\/strong> are phallic (in order to exist, according to Lacan, something must be articulable within our signifying system determined by the phallic signifier); but that does not mean there cannot be some jouissances that are not phallic. It is just that they do no exist; instead, they <em><strong>ex-sist<\/strong><\/em>.  The Other jouissance can only ex-sist, it cannot exist, for to exist it would have to be spoken, articulated, symbolized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">(Fink, 2004, 161)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Female Existential: &#8216;there is no entity x that says &#8220;no&#8221; to the phallic function&#8217;. There is not any that is not phallic jouissance, the emphasis going on the first &#8220;is.&#8221; All the jouissances that do exist are phallic (in order to exist, according to Lacan, something must be articulable within our signifying system determined by &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/04\/29\/3075\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;sexuation female existential&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,24,94,114,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-butler","category-lacan","category-sexual-difference","category-sexuation","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3075"}],"version-history":[{"count":14,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3141,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3075\/revisions\/3141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}