{"id":4014,"date":"2009-10-10T14:49:18","date_gmt":"2009-10-10T19:49:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=4014"},"modified":"2021-06-29T10:34:50","modified_gmt":"2021-06-29T14:34:50","slug":"jouissance-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/10\/10\/jouissance-2\/","title":{"rendered":"pluth jouissance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Pluth, Ed. <em>Signifiers and Acts: Freedom in Lacan&#8217;s Theory of the Subject<\/em>. Albany: SUNY Press, 2007.\u00a0 Print.<br \/>\n<strong>excessive unbearable tension, a tension that does not go away a tension that cannot be &#8220;relieved&#8221; by means of signifiers, because there is no signifier for it<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>for which the language of pleasure and displeasure is not adequate.<\/p>\n<p>There is thus a radical tension between this jouissance beyond the pleasure principle and the order of signifiers (75).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">For this reason, <strong>jouissance should be thought of in terms of real2<\/strong> \u2014 something that is not prior to and outside of signifiers but that appears within signifiers as an impasse in signification (77).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Jouissance is an impasse in the fabric of meaning<\/strong>, but in neurosis it is at least put into a relation with that fabric. In psychosis, this relation is missing, and there is a radical gulf between the symbolic and the real.\u00a0 In neurosis, there is also a gulf, but here is also a project to build a bridge across the gulf, an attempt to elaborate on a relation between the two.<\/p>\n<p>This study has at least given an indication now of how the body plays a role in Lacan&#8217;s theory of the subject.\u00a0 The <strong>body is the site and origin of a signifying impasse<\/strong>. Now this is not what Lacan usually calls the body in his theory. As we have seen the\u00a0 body is usually for Lacan something &#8220;overwritten&#8221; with signifiers.\u00a0\u00a0 For this reason, Lacan was not inclined to say that the &#8220;stirring&#8221; in Little Han&#8217;s genitals was something that involved his body. Little Hans already had a body image prior to this stirring. The emergence of genital sexuality introduced something that did not fit into this image \u2014 and so, Han&#8217;s penis, when it started acting up, was not something he experience as &#8220;his.&#8221;\u00a0 Nevertheless, from another point of view, this <strong>jouissance <\/strong>was indeed coming from Han&#8217;s body. What needs to be explained now is how this <strong>impasse originating in the body<\/strong> \u2014 an impasse that can be abbreviated under the heading of <strong>sexuality<\/strong> \u2014 <strong>plays a role in the production of the subject<\/strong> (78).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pluth, Ed. Signifiers and Acts: Freedom in Lacan&#8217;s Theory of the Subject. Albany: SUNY Press, 2007.\u00a0 Print. excessive unbearable tension, a tension that does not go away a tension that cannot be &#8220;relieved&#8221; by means of signifiers, because there is no signifier for it for which the language of pleasure and displeasure is not adequate. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2009\/10\/10\/jouissance-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;pluth jouissance&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111,21,24,40,119,15,106,41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-desire","category-jouissance","category-lacan","category-lack","category-language","category-subjectivity","category-the-act","category-the-real"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4014"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15076,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4014\/revisions\/15076"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}