{"id":4779,"date":"2010-01-28T19:01:53","date_gmt":"2010-01-28T23:01:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=4779"},"modified":"2011-01-16T15:44:19","modified_gmt":"2011-01-16T19:44:19","slug":"rothenberg-butler-abject","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/01\/28\/rothenberg-butler-abject\/","title":{"rendered":"rothenberg butler abject"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Having accepted the reasonable proposition that subjects are formed through language, she makes her theoretical missteps when she tries to figure out how to confer power on marginalized subjects by imagining that they can control the surplus attending all utterances &#8230; relying continually on a belief that somehow, the excess attending signification can be eradicated.\u00a0 In this persistent gesture, Butler reveals that she does not understand the subject as itself a site of excess (107).<\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\ude42 R.&#8217;s argument is thus: Butler like Foucault, claims that power is productive and produces resistance, but Butler is aware that Foucault theory of power doesn&#8217;t leave enough for the subject, that it is too productive in fact, that discourse only produces positivity and hence no room for contingency, as R. quotes Butler, &#8220;any effort of discursive interpellation or constitution is subject to failure, haunted by contingency, to the extent that discourse invariably fails to totalize the social field (<em>Bodies That Matter<\/em> 191-192)&#8221; (108).\u00a0 Rothenberg likes this last quote very much.\u00a0\u00a0 For a brief shining moment, both seem to be on the same page.\u00a0 That is until &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Butler uses psychoanalysis to pry open Foucaultian immanence.\u00a0 As R. points out, for Butler, psychoanalysis is too ahistorical, &#8220;a charge she bases on her belief that psychoanalysis presents castration as a universal form of lack (<em>Bodies That Matter<\/em> 202 quoted in R).\u00a0 So, in order to benefit from the psychoanalytic model of subjectification, she proposes in <em>Excitable Speech<\/em> that subjects <strong>are formed by the installation of a lack that can be historicized<\/strong>.\u00a0 &#8230; She conceives of this lack &#8230;. in terms of <em>exclusion<\/em>, an exclusion that produces a realm of &#8220;unspeakability&#8221; as the condition of the emergence and sustenance of the subject proper, but the &#8220;contents&#8221; of which are determined historically&#8221; (108).\u00a0 Oh oh.<\/p>\n<p>\ud83d\ude42 Rothenberg pounces on this last gesture by Butler.\u00a0 Remember, the title of R&#8217;s book is <em>The Excessive Subject<\/em>.\u00a0 My point being that R. doesn&#8217;t have much time for a theory that presents subject formation in terms of <em>lack<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Having accepted the reasonable proposition that subjects are formed through language, she makes her theoretical missteps when she tries to figure out how to confer power on marginalized subjects by imagining that they can control the surplus attending all utterances &#8230; relying continually on a belief that somehow, the excess attending signification can be eradicated.\u00a0 &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/01\/28\/rothenberg-butler-abject\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;rothenberg butler abject&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[84,78,80,112,102,24,40,15],"tags":[143],"class_list":["post-4779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abject","category-butler","category-citationality","category-foreclosure","category-iterability","category-lacan","category-lack","category-subjectivity","tag-excessive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4779"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4779\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4781,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4779\/revisions\/4781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}