{"id":4784,"date":"2010-01-28T19:42:41","date_gmt":"2010-01-28T23:42:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=4784"},"modified":"2011-01-16T15:06:22","modified_gmt":"2011-01-16T19:06:22","slug":"rothenberg-butler-foreclosure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/01\/28\/rothenberg-butler-foreclosure\/","title":{"rendered":"rothenberg butler foreclosure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Again Rothenberg casts Butler&#8217;s theory as promoting a subject that is intentional, volitional and when this subject speaks, is transparent, perhaps even self-identical.\u00a0 In other words, R. is criticizing Butler that in Butler&#8217;s haste to show how agency happens, especially the agency of the excluded, the marginalized, she theorizes a liberal rational actor.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230; arguing that the political act of appropriating the &#8220;unspeakable&#8221; can lead to the political inclusion of dispossessed or marginalized people. Here she explicitly proposes that the subject can access the realm excluded by foreclosure by &#8220;speaking impossibly&#8221; or by &#8220;redrawing the distinction&#8221; &#8230; <strong>From her perspective, the politically motivated subject has to take the &#8220;risk&#8221; of accessing this realm, even at the cost of being seen as something other than a subject<\/strong> (109).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Butler&#8217;s argument is nothing less than the claim that the subject can transform the very conditions of (its own and others&#8217;) subject formation through special speech acts that control their own reception<\/span>.\u00a0 What has been excluded can be included &#8230;(109)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Again Rothenberg casts Butler&#8217;s theory as promoting a subject that is intentional, volitional and when this subject speaks, is transparent, perhaps even self-identical.\u00a0 In other words, R. is criticizing Butler that in Butler&#8217;s haste to show how agency happens, especially the agency of the excluded, the marginalized, she theorizes a liberal rational actor. &#8230; arguing &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/01\/28\/rothenberg-butler-foreclosure\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;rothenberg butler foreclosure&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,78,80,99,15],"tags":[143],"class_list":["post-4784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agency","category-butler","category-citationality","category-interpellation","category-subjectivity","tag-excessive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4784"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6188,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4784\/revisions\/6188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4784"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4784"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4784"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}