{"id":4812,"date":"2010-01-31T21:03:55","date_gmt":"2010-02-01T01:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=4812"},"modified":"2010-02-16T19:34:17","modified_gmt":"2010-02-16T23:34:17","slug":"butler-move-from-hegel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/01\/31\/butler-move-from-hegel\/","title":{"rendered":"butler move from hegel"},"content":{"rendered":"

We are not mere dyads on our own, since our exchange is conditioned and mediated by language, by conventions, by a sedimentation of norms that are social in character and that exceed the perspective of those involved in the exchange (28)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Post-Hegelians like Adriana Cavarero ask “who are you” and thus try to suggest that Hegel’s dialectic of recognition gets it wrong when it envelopes the other within the “I.”\u00a0 Although as Butler points out, Hegel reveals the shortcomings of the Master and Slave dyad of recognition, requiring a further incorporation under the sphere of ethics or sittlich..<\/em>, Butler is drawing parallels between Hegel’s ethical sphere and structure of normativity that underscores the ability for one to recognize an other.<\/p>\n

Whereas The Phenomenology of Spirit <\/em>moves from the scenario of the dyad toward a social theory of recognition, for Caverero it is necessary to ground the social in the dyadic encounter. She writes: “The “you” comes before the we<\/em>, before the plural you<\/em> and before the they<\/em>. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Susceptibility to others that is unwilled, unchosen, that is a condition of our responsiveness to others, even a condition of our responsibility for<\/em> them. It means, among other things, that this susceptibility designates a nonfreedom and, paradoxically, it is on the basis of this susceptibility over which we have no choice that we become responsible for others (87-88).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We are not mere dyads on our own, since our exchange is conditioned and mediated by language, by conventions, by a sedimentation of norms that are social in character and that exceed the perspective of those involved in the exchange (28) Post-Hegelians like Adriana Cavarero ask “who are you” and thus try to suggest that … Continue reading “butler move from hegel”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,111,32,100,15],"tags":[128],"class_list":["post-4812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-butler","category-desire","category-foucault","category-hegel","category-subjectivity","tag-givingccount"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4812"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4917,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4812\/revisions\/4917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}