{"id":5623,"date":"2010-05-06T12:40:35","date_gmt":"2010-05-06T16:40:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=5623"},"modified":"2012-10-12T23:00:09","modified_gmt":"2012-10-13T04:00:09","slug":"5623","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/05\/06\/5623\/","title":{"rendered":"mutual recognition 2\/2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Houlgate, Stephen. \u201cG.W.F. Hegel:<\/em> The Phenomenology of Spirit.\u201d <\/em>The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy. Eds. Solomon, Robert C. and David Sherman, 2003.\u00a0 8-29.\u00a0 Print.<\/p>\n

To begin with, self-consciousness did not “see the other as an essential being,” because in the other it saw only itself. Yet it did not enjoy an unalloyed sense of self either, since it found itself “over there” in another (that it did not properly recognize). Now, by contrast, self-consciousness has a clear sense of its own identity and recognizes that the other is something wholly other than and independent of itself<\/strong>. Consequently, it can at last fulfill the condition required for concrete self-consciousness: for it can find itself <\/em>recognized by and reflected in another that is known to be truly other.<\/em><\/p>\n

Achieving <\/em>self-consciousness, as we have seen, requires that I relate to myself in relating to that which is other than me<\/strong>. This means that I must relate to another self-consciousness that recognizes me alone. Self-consciousness must, therefore, be social and intersubjective.\u00a0 We now know that by itself recognition accorded to me by the other is not sufficient to enable me to be concretely self-conscious. To attain that end I must be recognized by another that I recognize in turn as a free and independent other.\u00a0 Genuine self-consciousness thus requires not just recognition of my identity by the other, but mutual<\/em> recognition by each of us of the other.<\/strong> Self-consciousness must be a “double movement of the two self-consciousnesses” working freely together. In such a movement, Hegel writes, “each sees the other<\/em> do the same as it does; each does itself what it demands of the other, and therefore also does what it does only in so far as the other does the same.\u00a0 Action by one side only would be useless because what is to happen can only be brought about by both.”<\/p>\n

Mutual recogntion, for Hegel, requires the uncoerced cooperation of the two (or more) self-consciousnesses involved. Indeed, not only must the two self-consciousnesses freely recognize one another; in fact,<\/p>\n

they must both recognize<\/em> that their mutual recognition and cooperation is needed for either to be concretely and objectively self-conscious. In Hegel’s own words, they must “recognize<\/em> themselves as mutually recognizing <\/em>one another.”<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As Williams points out, genuine self-consciousness involves much more than mere desire (though it must also incorporate desire). Whereas desire “seiz[es] upon and negat[es] the object,” genuine self-consciousness requires recognition from the other, which in turn entails “allowing the other to be what it is” and “letting the other go free.”\u00a0 Self-consciousness would like to know only itself<\/em> in the other and be the sole object of the other’s recognition. Such self-certainty can be achieved, however, only “through membership or partnership with Other.”\u00a0 For one person to have a concrete and objective understanding of himself, he must join together with somebody else.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Houlgate, Stephen. \u201cG.W.F. Hegel: The Phenomenology of Spirit.\u201d The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy. Eds. Solomon, Robert C. and David Sherman, 2003.\u00a0 8-29.\u00a0 Print. To begin with, self-consciousness did not “see the other as an essential being,” because in the other it saw only itself. Yet it did not enjoy an unalloyed sense of self … Continue reading “mutual recognition 2\/2”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[100],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hegel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5623"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5623\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5625,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5623\/revisions\/5625"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}