{"id":5681,"date":"2010-08-16T18:50:50","date_gmt":"2010-08-16T22:50:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=5681"},"modified":"2010-12-25T14:01:44","modified_gmt":"2010-12-25T18:01:44","slug":"nonnom-du-pere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/08\/16\/nonnom-du-pere\/","title":{"rendered":"Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Rothenberg, Molly Ann. <em>The Excessive Subject<\/em>. Malden M.A. : Polity Press, 2010.<\/p>\n<p>the <em>Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re<\/em> has no content, much less normative content. the addition of the negation, the <em>Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re, <\/em>makes the subject a signifier, which means that the subject does not control what s\/he means to others any more than s\/he can know for certain what others mean. In effect, the &#8220;paternal metaphor&#8221; places a &#8220;minus sign,&#8221; so to speak, on the immediacy of the presence f the individual, raising the question as to the meaning of the individual, and in this way makes of the individual a signifier, bringing the individual into the realm of signification from the realm of the Real. That is, the <em>Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re <\/em>is a metaphor for the process by which anything, including the child, ceases to simply <em>be<\/em> and comes to <em>mean<\/em>, which is to say that it enters into the defiles of linguistic mediation and social appropriation. No object simply means what it is; every object becomes a site of excessive meaning. To be a signifier \u2014and a subject\u2014 is to be stuck to an irreducible excess of meaning. In other words, &#8230; at its core is the social dimension of language, an unsymbolizable<em> excess<\/em> (not an unsymbolizable <em>exclusion<\/em>) produced by the conditions in which meaning arises as perpetually ungovernable (Rothenberg, 111).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/GraphSexuation.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-5687  aligncenter\" title=\"GraphSexuation\" src=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/GraphSexuation.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"180\" height=\"180\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/GraphSexuation.jpg 180w, https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/08\/GraphSexuation-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 180px) 85vw, 180px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rothenberg, Molly Ann. The Excessive Subject. Malden M.A. : Polity Press, 2010. the Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re has no content, much less normative content. the addition of the negation, the Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re, makes the subject a signifier, which means that the subject does not control what s\/he means to others any more than s\/he can know for certain what &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2010\/08\/16\/nonnom-du-pere\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Non\/Nom-du-P\u00e8re&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112,24,94,114,15,118,41],"tags":[143],"class_list":["post-5681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-foreclosure","category-lacan","category-sexual-difference","category-sexuation","category-subjectivity","category-symbolic","category-the-real","tag-excessive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5681"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5681\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6147,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5681\/revisions\/6147"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}