{"id":6469,"date":"2011-02-10T15:48:52","date_gmt":"2011-02-10T20:48:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=6469"},"modified":"2011-02-10T15:51:11","modified_gmt":"2011-02-10T20:51:11","slug":"6469","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/10\/6469\/","title":{"rendered":"\u017di\u017eek"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Zizek, <em>The Most Sublime of Hysterics: Hegel with Lacan<\/em><br \/>\nThis essay was originally published in French in Le plus sublime des hyst\u00e9riques &#8211; Hegel passe, Broch\u00e9, Paris, 1999. It appears in Interrogating the Real, London: Continuum, 2005, Rex Butler and Scott Stephens editors.<\/p>\n<p>The idea that one is able from the outset to account for error, to take it under consideration as error, and therefore to take one&#8217;s distance from it, is precisely the supreme error of the existence of metalanguage, the illusion that <strong>while taking part in illusion, one is somehow also able to observe the process from an &#8216;objective&#8217; distance. By avoiding identifying oneself with error, we commit the supreme error and miss the truth, because the place of truth itself is only constituted through error.<\/strong> To put this another way, we could recall the Hegelian proposition which can be paraphrased as &#8216;the fear of error is error itself: the true evil is not the evil object but the one who perceives evil as such.<\/p>\n<p>One already finds this logic of the error interior to truth in Rosa Luxemburg&#8217;s description of the dialectic of the revolutionary process. When Eduard Bernstein raised objections apropos of the revisionist fear of taking power &#8216;too soon&#8217;, prematurely, before the &#8216;objective conditions&#8217; have reached their maturity, she responded that the first seizures of power are necessarily &#8216;premature&#8217;: for the proletariat, the only way of arriving at &#8216;maturity&#8217;, of waiting for the &#8216;opportune&#8217; moment to seize power, is to form themselves, prepare themselves for this seizure; and the only way of forming themselves is, of course, these &#8216;premature&#8217; attempts &#8230; If we wait for the &#8216;opportune moment&#8217;, we will never attain it, because this &#8216;opportune moment&#8217; &#8211; that which never occurs without fulfilling the subjective conditions for the &#8216;maturity&#8217; of the revolutionary subject &#8211; can only occur through a series of &#8216;premature&#8217; attempts. Thus the opposition to the &#8216;premature&#8217; seizure of power is exposed as an opposition to the seizure of power in general, as such: to repeat the celebrated phrase of Robespierre, the revisionists want &#8216;revolution without revolution&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Once we examine things more closely, we see that Luxemburg&#8217;s fundamental wager is precisely the <strong>impossibility of a metalanguage <\/strong>in the revolutionary process:<\/p>\n<p>the revolutionary subject does not &#8216;conduct&#8217; the process from an objective distance, he is himself constituted through this process; and it is because the time of revolution occurs by means of subjectivity that no one is able to &#8216;achieve revolution on time&#8217;, following &#8216;premature&#8217;, insufficient efforts.<\/p>\n<p>The attitude of Luxemburg is exactly that of the hysteric faced with the obsessional metalanguage of revisionism:<strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>strive to act, even if prematurely<\/strong>, in order to arrive at the correct act through this very error. One must be duped in one&#8217;s desire, though it is ultimately impossible, <strong>in order that something real comes about.<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The propositions of &#8216;grasping substance as subject&#8217; and &#8216;there is no metalanguage&#8217; are merely variations on the same theme. It is therefore impossible to say: &#8216;Although there must be premature attempts at revolution, have no illusions and remain conscious that they are doomed in advance to failure.&#8217; The idea that we are able to act and yet retain some distance with regard to the &#8216;objective&#8217; &#8211; making possible some consideration of the act&#8217;s &#8216;objective signification&#8217; (namely, its destiny to fail) during the act itself &#8211; misperceives the way that the &#8216;subjective illusion&#8217; of the agents is part of the &#8216;objective&#8217; process itself. This is why the revolution must be repeated: the &#8216;meaning&#8217; of those premature attempts is literally to be found in their failure &#8211; or rather, as one says with Hegel, &#8216;a political revolution is, in general, only sanctioned by popular opinion after it has been repeated&#8217;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Zizek, The Most Sublime of Hysterics: Hegel with Lacan This essay was originally published in French in Le plus sublime des hyst\u00e9riques &#8211; Hegel passe, Broch\u00e9, Paris, 1999. It appears in Interrogating the Real, London: Continuum, 2005, Rex Butler and Scott Stephens editors. The idea that one is able from the outset to account for &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/10\/6469\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;\u017di\u017eek&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,100,24,15,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6469","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-butler","category-hegel","category-lacan","category-subjectivity","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6469","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6469"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6469\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6471,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6469\/revisions\/6471"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}