{"id":6733,"date":"2011-02-16T10:15:11","date_gmt":"2011-02-16T15:15:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=6733"},"modified":"2013-02-25T18:07:15","modified_gmt":"2013-02-25T23:07:15","slug":"dialectic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/16\/dialectic\/","title":{"rendered":"dialectic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bryant, Levi R. &#8220;\u017di\u017eek\u2019s New Universe of Discourse: Politics and the Discourse of the Capitalist&#8221; International Journal of \u017di\u017eek Studies 2.4 (2008): 1-48. Web.<\/p>\n<p>[Quoting \u017di\u017eek]\u00a0 There are, roughly speaking, two philosophical approaches to an antagonistic constellation of either\/or: either one opts for one pole against the other (Good against Evil, freedom against oppression, morality against hedonism, etc.), or one adopts a \u2018deeper\u2019 attitude of emphasizing the complicity of the opposites, and of advocating a proper measure or their unity. Although Hegel\u2019s dialectic seems a version of the second approach (the \u2018synthesis\u2019 of opposites), he opts for an unheard-of <em>third<\/em> version: the way to resolve the deadlock is to engage oneself neither in fighting for the \u2018good\u2019 side against the \u2018bad\u2019 one, nor in trying to bring them together in a balanced \u2018synthesis\u2019, <strong>but in opting for the bad side of the initial either\/or. Of course, this \u2018choice of the worst\u2019 fails, but in this failure it undermines the entire field of alternatives and thus enables us to overcome its terms.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>( <em>Slavoj \u017di\u017eek Presents Mao on Practice and Contradiction<\/em>, 2007. 12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bryant, Levi R. &#8220;\u017di\u017eek\u2019s New Universe of Discourse: Politics and the Discourse of the Capitalist&#8221; International Journal of \u017di\u017eek Studies 2.4 (2008): 1-48. Web. [Quoting \u017di\u017eek]\u00a0 There are, roughly speaking, two philosophical approaches to an antagonistic constellation of either\/or: either one opts for one pole against the other (Good against Evil, freedom against oppression, morality &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/16\/dialectic\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;dialectic&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,100,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dia-mat","category-hegel","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6733"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6733\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6736,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6733\/revisions\/6736"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}