{"id":7164,"date":"2011-02-27T13:06:52","date_gmt":"2011-02-27T18:06:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=7164"},"modified":"2011-02-27T13:11:02","modified_gmt":"2011-02-27T18:11:02","slug":"slave-jouissance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/27\/slave-jouissance\/","title":{"rendered":"slave jouissance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek, Slavoj. &#8220;Love Thy Neighbor? No , Thanks!&#8221;\u00a0 in <em>Psychoanalysis and Racism<\/em>. ed.\u00a0 Anthony Lane, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.\u00a0\u00a0 154-175.) a slighty different version of this essay appears in <em>The Plague of Fantasies<\/em>. London: Verso, 1997.<\/p>\n<p>According to Lacan, Hegel, in his dialectics of Lord and Bondsman, misses the key point: <strong>Jouissance is on the side not of the Master but rather of his servant<\/strong> \u2014 that is, <span style=\"color: red; font-weight: bold;\">what keeps the servant enslaved is precisely the little piece of jouissance thrown to him by his Master<\/span>.\u00a0 Lacan&#8217;s reproach to the standard version of the Cunning of Reason (the Slave who works and thus renounces jouissance, this way laying foundation for his future freedom, in contrast to the Master who is idioticized by his jouissance) is that it is, on the contrary, the Slave who has access to jouissance from his ambiguous relation to the Other&#8217;s supposed jouissance (to Master qua &#8220;subject supposed to enjoy&#8221;).\u00a0 See Lacan, &#8220;Subversion.&#8221;\u00a0 (page 174, Note 2)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek, Slavoj. &#8220;Love Thy Neighbor? No , Thanks!&#8221;\u00a0 in Psychoanalysis and Racism. ed.\u00a0 Anthony Lane, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.\u00a0\u00a0 154-175.) a slighty different version of this essay appears in The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso, 1997. According to Lacan, Hegel, in his dialectics of Lord and Bondsman, misses the key point: Jouissance is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/02\/27\/slave-jouissance\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;slave jouissance&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,24,15,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jouissance","category-lacan","category-subjectivity","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7164"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7167,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7164\/revisions\/7167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}