{"id":7712,"date":"2011-04-27T12:38:29","date_gmt":"2011-04-27T17:38:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=7712"},"modified":"2011-04-27T13:08:30","modified_gmt":"2011-04-27T18:08:30","slug":"glynos-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/04\/27\/glynos-2\/","title":{"rendered":"glynos 2"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Glynos, Jason. in Carl Cederstr\u00f6m and Casper Hoedemaekers (eds) Lacan and Organization London: MayFlyBooks, 2010<\/p>\n<p>There is a general consensus in the literature that the mode of engagement associated with an <span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold;\">ethics of \u2018openness\u2019<\/span> is to be preferred, especially when thinking critically about the political economy and about the transformation of the organization of work more specifically. What receives much less attention in this literature, however, are questions about<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">(1) what these alternative modes of engagement actually look like in practice; and (2) the conditions under which a transition is made from one to another mode of engagement.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There is of course considerable theoretical reflection on the <strong>concept of ethics<\/strong> in Lacan, which for many has become synonymous with the idea of \u2018<span style=\"color: red; font-weight: bold;\">traversing the fantasy<\/span>\u2019. But there is a need to add to these ontological discussions a more robust ontical base by, for example, building up a corpus of empirical examples, exemplars, or paradigms of different sorts of ethical engagement associated with the \u2018dissolution\u2019 of the logic of fantasy. This would entail supplementing existing studies that furnish negative critiques of modes of engagement characterized by \u2018closure\u2019 with rich phenomenological accounts of what appears on the \u2018other side\u2019 of posited fantasmatic traversals.<\/p>\n<p>What conditions and devices, for example, might promote <strong>a specifically democratic ethos in organizations akin to a Lacanian<\/strong> \u2018<span style=\"color: green; font-weight: bold;\">ethics of the real<\/span>\u2019?<\/p>\n<p>For a call to explore the relation between a radical democratic ethos and an \u2018<span style=\"color: green; font-weight: bold;\">ethics of the real<\/span>\u2019, see Mouffe, C. (2000) <em>The Democratic Paradox<\/em>,(conclusion); on this, see also Glynos, J. (2003) \u2018Radical democratic ethos, or, what is an authentic political act?\u2019, <em>Contemporary Political Theory<\/em>, 2(2): 187-208.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Glynos, Jason. in Carl Cederstr\u00f6m and Casper Hoedemaekers (eds) Lacan and Organization London: MayFlyBooks, 2010 There is a general consensus in the literature that the mode of engagement associated with an ethics of \u2018openness\u2019 is to be preferred, especially when thinking critically about the political economy and about the transformation of the organization of work &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2011\/04\/27\/glynos-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;glynos 2&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78,138,21,24,40,69,4,15,41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-butler","category-butlerethics","category-jouissance","category-lacan","category-lack","category-laclau","category-logics-of-critical-explanation","category-subjectivity","category-the-real"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7712"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7714,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7712\/revisions\/7714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}