{"id":8824,"date":"2012-02-26T17:47:54","date_gmt":"2012-02-26T22:47:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=8824"},"modified":"2013-04-12T07:05:54","modified_gmt":"2013-04-12T12:05:54","slug":"zupancic-ethics-of-real","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/02\/26\/zupancic-ethics-of-real\/","title":{"rendered":"zupan\u010di\u010d ethics of real"},"content":{"rendered":"

Zupan\u010di\u010d, Alenka. Ethics of the Real. <\/em>2000
\n<\/em>It is at precisely this point that we must situate the scandal of this dialogue: the terror of Turelure ‘s demands pales before the terror inflicted upon Sygne ( through the intermediary of Badilon ) by the Holy Father.<\/p>\n

Thou shalt love thy neighbour\u00a0as thyself<\/strong>, has not lost its currency. The commandment in\u00a0question is evident in the profane discourse of ethics (and\u00a0politics), where it presents itself under the flag of ‘cultural\u00a0diversity’ and the associated commandment: ‘Respect the difference\u00a0of the other.’ This commandment, it is true, does not ask\u00a0that we love the neighbour\/other \u2014 it suffices that we “tolerate”\u00a0him or her. But it seems that at bottom, as Freud would say, it\u00a0comes down to the same thing. …\u00a0Thus Badiou has observed:<\/p>\n

A first suspicion arises when we consider that the proclaimed apostles\u00a0of ethics and of the ‘right to difference’ are visibly horrified by any\u00a0difference that is even a bit pronounced. Because for them, African\u00a0costumes are barbarous, Islamic fundamentalists are frightening, as is\u00a0the Chinese totalitarian, and so on. In truth, this famous “other” is\u00a0not presentable unless he is a good other<\/span>, that is to say, insofar as he’s\u00a0the same as us … Just as there is no freedom for the enemies of\u00a0freedom, so there is no respect for those whose difference consists\u00a0precisely in not respecting differences.<\/p>\n

That is to say: one finds here the same conjuncture as in the case of the commandment to ‘love thy neighbour’: what happens if this neighbour is ‘wicked’, if he or she has a completely different idea of the world, if he or she gets his or her enjoyment in a manner that conflicts with mine?<\/p>\n

When Lacan, in The Ethics of Psychoanalysis<\/em>, comments on the commandment ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself’<\/strong>, and on Freud’s hesitation regarding\u00a0this subject, he formulates its impasse with essentially\u00a0same words as Badiou uses in speaking of the ‘right to ‘difference ‘ :<\/p>\n

My egoism is quite content with a certain altruism, altruism of the kind that is situated on the level of the useful. And it even becomes the pretext by means of which I can avoid taking up the problem of the evil I desire, and that my neighbour desires also … What I want is the good of others in the image of my own. That doesn’t cost so much. What I want is the good of others provided that it remain in the image of my own.<\/p>\n

we cannot conceive of radical alterity, of the ‘completely other’ (to which Lacan gives the Freudian name das Ding [the Thing]<\/span>), without bringing up the question of the Same (as opposed to the similar). The similar [le semblable] presupposes and necessitates difference; it requires \u2014 in Badiou’s terms – a multiplicity, even an ‘infinite multiplicity’<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Contrary to this, the problem of enjoyment is the problem of the Same, which must be excluded so that this multiplicity can be closed, or ‘united’<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The moment the similar gives way to the Same, evil appears, and with it the hostility associated with the ‘completely other’<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Sygne’s real ethical act<\/span> does not consist simply in her sacrifice of everything that is dearest to her; this act<\/span> is, rather, to be found in the final scene of the play: the act<\/span> in the proper sense of the term, the ethical act<\/span>, resides in Sygne’s ‘no’ It is only this ‘no’ that propels her sacrifice into the dimension of the real.<\/span> Let us now turn to this ‘no’ to\u00a0determine its status, and to specify the relation between the two scenes or ‘events’ in question, Sygne’s sacrifice and her ‘no’.<\/p>\n

The thesis which seems the most questionable is the one according to which we realize at the end that Sygne, ‘by some part of herself’, had not really given way or adhered to the politico-religious compromise demanded of her. Contrary to this reading we would insist that:<\/p>\n

1. Her act<\/span> (of sacrifice) is not an instance of ‘giving up on one’s desire ‘ but, rather, one of pure desire; it is characteristic of the logic of desire itself to have as its ultimate horizon the sacrifice of the very thing in the name of which Sygne is ready to sacrifice everything.<\/p>\n

2. There is in fact a connection that leads from ‘Sygne’s choice ‘ (her sacrifice) to her final ‘ no ‘. That is to say: without her initial choice, Sygne would never have reached an occasion for Versagung, and \u2014 it follows from this \u2014<\/p>\n

3 . In the final analysis, it is precisely Badilon who leads her to this ‘negation’; this means that he is not the simple opposite of the analyst<\/span> but that, in a certain respect, he ‘personifies’ the position of the analyst<\/span>.<\/p>\n

Maxim of ethics of desire<\/em>: Sadder than to lose one’s life is it to lose one’s reason for living.<\/p>\n

Sacrifice everything, including her life to HONOUR (her reason to live).<\/p>\n

Life is situated not in the register of being, but in the register of having, HONOUR is something that belongs to the very being of Sygne. 231<\/p>\n

It is not this choice: Life or HONOUR<\/p>\n

It is this choice: if HONOUR is the only thing left to her, if she has nothing else to give, she will have to give this last thing 231<\/p>\n

The logic of Sygne’s sacrifice remains inscribed in the logic of desire, and represents the ultimate horizon of her ‘fundamental fantasy’. But the paradox here is that the moment Sygne attains this ultimate horizon, she is already obliged to go beyond it, to leave it behind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Zupan\u010di\u010d, Alenka. Ethics of the Real. 2000 It is at precisely this point that we must situate the scandal of this dialogue: the terror of Turelure ‘s demands pales before the terror inflicted upon Sygne ( through the intermediary of Badilon ) by the Holy Father. Thou shalt love thy neighbour\u00a0as thyself, has not lost … Continue reading “zupan\u010di\u010d ethics of real”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,79,24,15,106,41,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8824","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics","category-ethics_real","category-lacan","category-subjectivity","category-the-act","category-the-real","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8824","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8824"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8824\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10795,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8824\/revisions\/10795"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8824"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8824"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8824"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}