{"id":8853,"date":"2012-02-28T00:27:30","date_gmt":"2012-02-28T05:27:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=8853"},"modified":"2013-04-12T07:07:12","modified_gmt":"2013-04-12T12:07:12","slug":"parallax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/02\/28\/parallax\/","title":{"rendered":"parallax kant sade"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, far from announcing a triumphant solution, Lacan\u2019s \u201cKant avec Sade,\u201d his assertion of Sade as the truth of Kant, rather names an embarrassing problem that Lacan failed to resolve \u2014 and did not even fully confront \u2014 in his Ethics seminar: how are we to distinguish the appearance of pure desire\u2014the violent gesture of transgressing the social domain of \u201cservicing goods\u201d and entering the terrifying domain of ate, that is, the ethical stance of the subject who \u201cdoes not compromise his desire\u201d\u2014from the fully consummated \u201cpassion for the Real,\u201d the subject\u2019s disappearance-immersion in the primordial jouissance? 95<\/p>\n<p>What, then, is the Fall from this Kantian perspective? Consider the first moments of a feminist awakening: it all begins not with a direct attack on patriarchy, but with experiencing one\u2019s situation as unjust and humiliating, one\u2019s passivity as a failure to act\u2014is this very overwhelming awareness of failure not in itself a positive sign? Does it not, in a negative way, bear witness to the fact that women clearly perceive the need to assert themselves, that they perceive the lack of it as a failure? In the same way,\u201cFall\u201d is the first step toward liberation\u2014it represents the moment of knowledge, of cognizance of one\u2019s situation. Thus \u201cfall into sin\u201d is a purely formal change: nothing changes in reality, it is just the subject\u2019s stance toward reality that undergoes a radical change.<\/p>\n<p>This means that the Fall in the religious sense (the knowledge of sin) is already a reaction to the Fall proper, the retreat from the \u201cdizziness of freedom.\u201dThis is why it is crucial to realize that Kierkegaard leaps over the first contraction of finitude, the first emergence of a <span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold;\">sinthome<\/span> which makes the subject a creature proper, and goes directly from the primordial repose to the Prohibition.We should focus on the difference between the two withdrawals from the Void of infinity: the first one is the primordial contraction that creates the <span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold;\">sinthome<\/span> \u2014 it precedes Prohibition, while it is only the second one, the retreat from the \u201cdizziness of freedom,\u201d which is the Fall proper: with it,we enter the domain of the superego, of the vicious cycle of the Law and its transgression.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, far from announcing a triumphant solution, Lacan\u2019s \u201cKant avec Sade,\u201d his assertion of Sade as the truth of Kant, rather names an embarrassing problem that Lacan failed to resolve \u2014 and did not even fully confront \u2014 in his Ethics seminar: how are we to distinguish the appearance of pure desire\u2014the violent gesture of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/02\/28\/parallax\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;parallax kant sade&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125,79,24,40,123,15,106,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drive","category-ethics_real","category-lacan","category-lack","category-sinthome","category-subjectivity","category-the-act","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8853"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8853\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10798,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8853\/revisions\/10798"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}