{"id":9634,"date":"2012-10-26T09:54:25","date_gmt":"2012-10-26T14:54:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=9634"},"modified":"2012-10-26T09:54:25","modified_gmt":"2012-10-26T14:54:25","slug":"zs-critique-of-badiou","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/10\/26\/zs-critique-of-badiou\/","title":{"rendered":"\u017d&#8217;s critique of Badiou"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Johnston, Adrian. Badiou, Zizek, and Political Transformations: The Cadence of Change. Northwestern University Press, 2009.<\/p>\n<p>\u017di\u017eek\u2019s argument is that Badiou&#8217;s need philosophically to prohibit the theoretical delineation of the (pre-evental ) emergence of the evental\u00a0 out of the ontological , a prohibition \u017di\u017eek identifies as betraying the allegedly idealist core buried within the heart of Badiouian philosophy, is an inevitable, necessary by-product of mathematizing ontology, of insisting that set theory is the sole &#8220;science&#8221; up to the task of thinking<em> l&#8217;\u00eatre en tant qu&#8217;\u00eatre<\/em>.\u00a0 In <em>Organs Without Bodies<\/em>, \u017di\u017eek \u00a0describes what he sees as the proper manner in which genuine materialism would accommodate the phenomena Badiou struggles to grasp vis his fundamental disctinction between being and event:<\/p>\n<p>The materialist solution is &#8230; that <strong>the Event is <em>nothing but<\/em> its own inscription into the order of Being<\/strong>, a cut\/rupture in the order of Being on account of which Being cannot ever form a consistent All.\u00a0 There is no Beyond of Being that inscribes itself into the order of Being.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold;\">There \u201cis\u201d nothing but the order of Being &#8230; An Event does not curve the space of Being through its inscription into it: on the contrary, an Event is <em>nothing but<\/em> this curvature of the space of Being.\u00a0 \u201cAll there is\u201d is the interstice, the nonself-coincidence, of Being, namely, the ontological nonclosure of the order of Being<span>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>What this means at the ontological level is that, ultimately, one should reject Badiou\u2019s notion of mathematics (the theory of pure multiplicity) as the only consistent ontology (science of Being); if mathematics is ontology, then, to account for the <em>gap<\/em> between Being and Event, one either remains stuck in dualism <em>or<\/em> one has to dismiss the Event as an ultimately illusory local occurrence within the encompassing order of Being.\u00a0 Against this notion of multiplicity, one should assert as the ultimate ontological given the gap that separates the One from within.\u00a0 (\u017di\u017eek cited in Johnstone BZPT 2009 136)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Johnston, Adrian. Badiou, Zizek, and Political Transformations: The Cadence of Change. Northwestern University Press, 2009. \u017di\u017eek\u2019s argument is that Badiou&#8217;s need philosophically to prohibit the theoretical delineation of the (pre-evental ) emergence of the evental\u00a0 out of the ontological , a prohibition \u017di\u017eek identifies as betraying the allegedly idealist core buried within the heart of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/10\/26\/zs-critique-of-badiou\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;\u017d&#8217;s critique of Badiou&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-badiou","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9634"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9636,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634\/revisions\/9636"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}