{"id":9705,"date":"2012-11-07T00:25:50","date_gmt":"2012-11-07T05:25:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=9705"},"modified":"2012-11-07T00:25:50","modified_gmt":"2012-11-07T05:25:50","slug":"objet-a-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/11\/07\/objet-a-3\/","title":{"rendered":"objet (a)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Schroeder, L. Wall Street&#8217;s Bonus Obsession.\u00a0<em>Cardozo L. Rev.<\/em> 33 \u00a0 2011-2012\u00a0 pp. 2308-2356.<\/p>\n<p>quoting \u017d<\/p>\n<p>However, <strong>what we must avoid at any price <\/strong>is conceiving of this left-over as simply secondary, as if we have first the substantial fullness of the Real and then the process of symbolization which &#8220;evacuates&#8221; jouissance, yet not entirely, leaving behind isolated remainders, islands of enjoyment, <em><strong>objets petit a<\/strong><\/em>. If we succumb to this notion, we lose the paradox of the <strong>Lacanian Real<\/strong>: there is no substance of enjoyment without, prior to, the surplus of enjoyment.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-weight: bold;\">The substance is a mirage retroactively invoked by the surplus.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The illusion that pertains to <span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: red; font-size: 14pt; font-style: italic;\">a<\/span> qua surplus-enjoyment is therefore the very illusion that, behind it, there is the lost substance of jouissance in other words, <span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: red; font-size: 14pt; font-style: italic;\">a<\/span> qua semblance deceives in a Lacanian way: not because it is a deceitful substitute of the Real, but precisely because it invokes the impression of some substantial Real behind it; it deceives by posing as a shadow of the underlying Real.\u00a0 [\u017di\u017eek <em>Tarrying with the Negative<\/em> 36-37]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Schroeder, L. Wall Street&#8217;s Bonus Obsession.\u00a0Cardozo L. Rev. 33 \u00a0 2011-2012\u00a0 pp. 2308-2356. quoting \u017d However, what we must avoid at any price is conceiving of this left-over as simply secondary, as if we have first the substantial fullness of the Real and then the process of symbolization which &#8220;evacuates&#8221; jouissance, yet not entirely, leaving &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/11\/07\/objet-a-3\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;objet (a)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,72,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lacan","category-objet-a","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9705"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9706,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9705\/revisions\/9706"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}