{"id":9718,"date":"2012-11-08T18:34:17","date_gmt":"2012-11-08T23:34:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/?p=9718"},"modified":"2012-11-08T19:48:00","modified_gmt":"2012-11-09T00:48:00","slug":"z-at-egs-2012-zizek_big_other-mp4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/11\/08\/z-at-egs-2012-zizek_big_other-mp4\/","title":{"rendered":"\u017d at EGS 2012  \u017di\u017eek_Big_Other.mp4"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek doesn&#8217;t accord much to Lacan&#8217;s seminar on Ethics of Psychoanalysis.\u00a0 He said it ended in a deadlock.\u00a0\u00a0 Lacan immediately turned away.\u00a0 Jean Claude Milner, &#8220;Do not give way as to your desire&#8221; Lacan says this only once or twice in one lecture.\u00a0 He never returns to it.\u00a0 This is because it is not Lacan&#8217;s position.\u00a0 He was trying to work something out and things are more complicated.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>7:30 Madness: Psychotic withdrawal and then come habit in efforts to calm and get stability.<\/p>\n<p>1st act of freedom is that you treat as freely chosen something that is deemed absolutely necessary<\/p>\n<p>Why does Antigone insist on funeral rights.\u00a0 Symbolic act the natural necessity of dying<\/p>\n<p>Antigone: for \u017d she is an evil bitch.<\/p>\n<p>13:10 \u017d&#8217;s 3rd version of Antigone.\u00a0 Jacobin revolutionary Chorus steps forward and establishes popular dictatorship, the Chorus becomes a Jacobin council for revolutionary democracy<\/p>\n<p>\u017di\u017eek_Big_Other.mp4<br \/>\n18:00<br \/>\nIf it is prohibited it arouses my desire (St. Paul) the LOGIC OF TRANSGRESSION.\u00a0 \u017d doesn&#8217;t think much of this.\u00a0 It is Bataille&#8217;s theory.\u00a0 In order to do transgression you need the law first to prohibit it.\u00a0 Desire is only produced by the prohibition of law.<br \/>\n25:00 Bottle of beer, reducing the other to a partial object sex for\u00a0 procreation (children) you have to be married<br \/>\nsex for loveLaura Kipnis: Against Love.\u00a0 \u017d thinks that on the contrary, love is more and more a radical thing.\u00a0 It isn&#8217;t a bourgois decadence.\u00a0 (Does he have Kipnes right here?)<\/p>\n<p>27:00 \u017d against the flux of identity, Today more and more LOVE is the transgression<br \/>\nThe message you get from society is not marriage and be faithful, but Dalai Lama hedonism.<\/p>\n<p>30:00 Empirical proof of the big Other<\/p>\n<p>From Vertigo, jumps into the bay, takes her out of the bay, undresses her and puts her into his bed.\u00a0 Above the kitchen sink he hangs her dresses.<\/p>\n<p>The camera shot implies that her panties are hanging above the kitchen sink.\u00a0 But if you put it on freeze there is no panties and bras, just towels and dress.<\/p>\n<p>Hays Code censorship.\u00a0 It should not be really underwear because this would be proof that he say her naked while undressing her.\u00a0 And they are not married.<\/p>\n<p>But who are they protecting.\u00a0 The viewers assume it is underwear.\u00a0 They act as if, there is a big Other an innocent gaze, and that gaze should be protected.\u00a0 You must include the innocent gaze of the big Other for whom Appearances Must be Maintained.\u00a0 Don&#8217;t underestimate the appearances.<\/p>\n<p>34:00 Cascablanca scene.\u00a0 Did they do it or not?<\/p>\n<p>37:11\u00a0 Richard Maltby wrote a text on this scene.\u00a0 The scene is contructed as consciously contradictory. There is a series of codified signals that they did it, but there are other codes that they didn&#8217;t.<br \/>\nThe film addresses us at 2 levels simultaneously, we live in repressive times so I will give you a moral cover, you can say no they didn&#8217;t do it, but they also give you codified signs all the possible transgressions to fantasize.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u017di\u017eek doesn&#8217;t accord much to Lacan&#8217;s seminar on Ethics of Psychoanalysis.\u00a0 He said it ended in a deadlock.\u00a0\u00a0 Lacan immediately turned away.\u00a0 Jean Claude Milner, &#8220;Do not give way as to your desire&#8221; Lacan says this only once or twice in one lecture.\u00a0 He never returns to it.\u00a0 This is because it is not Lacan&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/2012\/11\/08\/z-at-egs-2012-zizek_big_other-mp4\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;\u017d at EGS 2012  \u017di\u017eek_Big_Other.mp4&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-objet-a","category-zizek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9718"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9718\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9723,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9718\/revisions\/9723"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.terada.ca\/discourse\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}