Ž responds to his critics

February 28 2013  A Reply to My Critics.

Room B01
Clore Management Centre
Birkbeck, University of London
Torrington Square
London WC1E 7HX

If we cannot imagine a society which is not held together by a Master figure but in a different way then we can pack our luggage and just say ok let’s play pragmatic politics.  The challenges are great here.  I think that in this debate Badiou versus postmodern fluid plural multitude figures of authority I think that both poles are wrong.  The structure of a Master as well as this polymorphous multitude structure doesn’t function.  There are some hints in Lacan or somewhere you can have a social link which is not founded on the figure of the Master.

large want to be passive, permanent participation, engagement, I much perfer to be passive citizen, I want a state that does its work. I don’t despise ordinary people.  Engaged people don’t know what they want

Rehabilitate an ‘elite’ A good politician tells the people what they want, if he’s good, people have this “oh my god, yes now I know what I want.”

Molecular self-organizing multitude against hierarchical order:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *