Liminal: of or relating to a sensory threshold : barely perceptible : of, relating to, or being an intermediate state, phase, or condition : in-between , transitional
Category: dubash
chiasm
“We are in each of these cases caught in a chiasmic relation, one in which the terms to be related also partake of one another, but do not collapse into one another.” Butler in talk with Connolly
Our embodied subjectivity is never located purely in either our tangibility or in our touching, but in the intertwining of these two aspects, or where the two lines of a chiasm intersect with one another. The chiasm then, is simply an image to describe how this overlapping and encroachment can take place between a pair that nevertheless retains a divergence, in that touching and touched are obviously never exactly the same thing.
sub specie aeternitatis
sub specie aeternitatis: In its essential or universal form or nature, what is universal or eternally true without any reference to or dependence upon the merely temporal portions of reality
prounce it like this
belie
belie
1. To picture falsely; misrepresent: “He spoke roughly in order to belie his air of gentility” James Joyce.
2. To show to be false: Their laughter belied their outward grief.
3. To be counter to; contradict: At first glance, life at the boarding school seemed to belie all the bad things I had heard about it.
4. His innocent face belies his cunning.
poiesis
Martin Heidegger refers to it as a ‘bringing-forth’, using this term in its widest sense. He explained poiesis as the blooming of the blossom, the coming-out of a butterfly from a cocoon, the plummeting of a waterfall when the snow begins to melt. The last two analogies underline Heidegger’s example of a threshold occasion: a moment of ecstasis when something moves away from its standing as one thing to become another.
catachresis
CATACHRESIS (Grk. “misuse, misapplication”): A completely impossible figure of speech or an implied metaphor that results from combining other extreme figures of speech such as anthimeria, hyperbole, synaesthesia, and metonymy. The results in each case are so unique that it is hard to state a general figure of speech that embodies all of the possible results. It is far easier to give examples.
For instance, Hamlet says of Gertrude, “I will speak daggers to her.” A man can speak words, but no one can literally speak daggers. In spite of that impossibility, readers know Shakespeare means Hamlet will address Gertrude in a painful, contemptuous way. Sometimes the catachresis results from stacking one impossibility on top of another.
Can’t you hear that? Are you blind?
Red trains cough Jewish underwear for keeps! Expanding smells of silence. Gravy snot whistling like sea birds.”
(Amiri Baraka, The Dutchman)
“Joe will have kittens when he hears this!”
Catachresis often results from hyperbole and synaesthesia. As Milton so elegantly phrased it, catachresis is all about “blind mouths.”
A special subtype of catachresis is abusio, a mixed metaphor that results when two metaphors collide. For instance, one U. S. senator learned of an unlikely political alliance. He is said to have exclaimed, “Now that is a horse of a different feather.” This abusio is the result of two metaphors. The first is the cliché metaphor comparing anything unusual to “a horse of a different color.” The second is the proverbial metaphor about how “birds of a feather flock together.” However, by taking the two dead metaphors and combining them, the resulting image of “a horse of a different feather” truly emphasizes how bizarre and unlikely the resulting political alliance was. Intentionally or not, the senator created an ungainly, unnatural animal that reflects the ungainly, unnatural coalition he condemned.
Purists of languages often scowl at abusio with good reason. Too commonly abusio is the result of sloppy writing, such as the history student who wrote “the dreadful hand of totalitarianism watches all that goes on around it and growls at its enemies.” (It would have been better to stick with a single metaphor and state “the eye of totalitarianism watches all that goes on around it and glares at its enemies.” We should leave out the mixed imagery of watchful hands growling at people; it’s just stupid and inconsistent.) However, when used intentionally for a subtle effect, abusio and catachresis can be powerful tools for originality.
butler althusser 1997
“Burning Acts, Injurious Speech” Excitable Speech 1977
J.L Austin
Constative utterance: actions performed by virtue of words
Performative utterance: you have words, and then you have ‘actions’ as a consequence of using ‘words’
For Nietzsche the subject appears only as a consequence of a demand for accountability; a set of painful effects is taken up by a moral framework that seeks to isolate the “cause” of those effects in a singular and intentional agent, a moral framework that operates through a certain economy of paranoid fabrication and efficiency.
The question, then, of who is accountable for a given injury precedes and initiates the subject, and the subject itself is formed through being nominated to inhabit that grammatical and juridical site. 216
In a sense for Nietzsche, the subject comes to be only within the requirements of a moral discourse of accountability. The requirements of blame figure the subject as the “cause” of an act. In this sense, there can be no subject without a blameworthy act, and there can be no “act” apart from a discourse of accountability and, according to Nietzsche, without an institution of punishment. 216
from page 219 JB Reader “The doctor who receives the child and pronounces —It’s a girl— begins that long string of interpellations by which the girl is transitively girled: gender is ritualistically repeated, whereby the repetition occasions both the risk of failure and the congealed effect of sedimentation.